gchristensen changed the topic of #nixos-chat to: NixOS but much less topical || https://logs.nix.samueldr.com/nixos-chat
<gchristensen> elvishjerricco: yeah, so, the kernel parameters, kernel, and initrd all get smushed in to a single EFI program and signed: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/53901/files#diff-9441fda2a31157c5210361c86c4b7eefR147
<gchristensen> that contains the whole boot chain up until mounting your disks, and then you're on your own
<elvishjerricco> gchristensen: Ohhh right. Yea I'm not a fan of having to build a whole new massive image just to change kernel params
* andi- ponders if supportin LUKS in gummiboot/systemd-boot is easier then the chain of issues he discovered with his Grub version
<elvishjerricco> I have /boot on ZFS over LUKS. Grub is able to boot from that
<andi-> yeah but not sytemd-boot :-)
<andi-> (if the kernel is encrypted)
<gchristensen> elvishjerricco: on one hand I agree, on the other hand, eh, 20mb.
<elvishjerricco> fair enough
<gchristensen> my understanding is grub can handle zfs, but poorly at certain dataset sizes.
<elvishjerricco> really? I'll have to watch out for that...
drakonis has joined #nixos-chat
<gchristensen> clever: maybe you have info on that
<clever> gchristensen: my undestanding, is that grub had trouble if /nix/store/ was over a certain size
<clever> so you had to set a copy kernels flag, to force nixos to copy them to /boot/ even if its on the same dataset as /nix/store/
<elvishjerricco> clever: Any idea why that was happening? Or a github issue or anything/
<elvishjerricco> ?*
<clever> and the limit was more about dir child counts, rather then byte size
<clever> i think its since been fixed
<clever> but i dont trust grub with zfs, because of all the other things it lacks
<clever> so i always use an ext4 /boot/
<elvishjerricco> clever: Other things like what?
<gchristensen> just guessing, but maybe fanciness like compression / dedup / etc support
<clever> it doesnt support the b-tree indexes in directory listings
<clever> so it cant quickly scan a dir for a child
<clever> and has to instead iterate over every single child
* clever eyes /nix/store again
<clever> it also doesnt support the journal and rollback
<clever> so if you have an improper shutdown, grub will just read the corrupt data, rather then recovering
iqubic has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
<colemickens> protip, it helps to get your math right when doing fancy stupid overlapping FS stuff
<gchristensen> oops what happened? :)
<colemickens> put a LUKS volume at the end of my drive, but bad sector math means that I put it roughly in the middle of an NTFS partition that I filled with data last night. Turns out I have a bad superblock now, go figure.
<colemickens> as it turns out 420M sector offset is not sufficient when the existing partition ends at 600M sectors. I honestly have no idea how I messed this up this badly.
<colemickens> Luckily they were historical archives that aren't really important, still feels bad.
<gchristensen> oh mann
<clever> colemickens: probably would help to let the kernel do the offset for you, via /dev/sdaX
<colemickens> Yeah, I said "fancy stupid stuff" for a reason. :|
<clever> what kind of fancy stuff?
<colemickens> Detached header + offset = psuedo-hidden partition
<clever> ah
<clever> another idea i just thought of
<clever> the ext2/3/4 fs, doesnt have to match the partition size
<clever> resize2fs can shrink an fs, or just extend the partition and dont resize2fs it
jackdk has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jackdk has joined #nixos-chat
<colemickens> clever: hm, I thought I was following, but I'm not sure where you're headed with that.
<clever> hiding your luks volume in unused space, inside a partition
<clever> between the end of an ext4, and the end of a partition
<colemickens> interesting. That way the disk looks fully partitioned at first glance.
<colemickens> another nice bit of indirection, I like it.
<clever> the only way to find that, is to know exactly how much overhead ext4 has, and compare `df -h` to `fdisk -l`
<clever> or to destructively run resize2fs, and see how much df -h grew
<colemickens> I might write/script this up (so that I can maybe have someone sanity review it and/or unit test it) and try it again since this whole drive can probably just be blanked.
<clever> "well, there was a 2gig luks volume at the end"
<clever> WAS being the key word :P
<colemickens> clever: surely ext4 is keeping some metadata on its size somewhere that you could compare to what the part table says?
<clever> debug2fs may show that
<clever> *looks*
<colemickens> well, I even had the partition boundary protecting me, had I done basic math right
<clever> /dev/sda2 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime)
<colemickens> like, it's not even hard math, it's multiply by 512, subtrace two numbers and I still got it wrong
<clever> /dev/sda2 146341888 147390463 1048576 512M 83 Linux
<clever> > 1048576 * 512 / 1024 / 1024
<clever> 512
<{^_^}> 512
<clever> exactly 512mb
<clever> finding the next util...
<clever> [root@amd-nixos:~]$ debugfs /dev/sda2
<clever> debugfs 1.44.4 (18-Aug-2018)
<clever> debugfs: show_super_stats
<clever> Block count: 131072
<clever> Block size: 4096
<clever> > 131072 * 4096 / 1024 / 1024
<{^_^}> 512
<clever> colemickens: yep, that matches the partition size perfectly
<clever> that also tells you what offset to start your luks at
<colemickens> nice
<colemickens> heh, I think a partition with a shrunked FS inside might be more suspicious than just some unpartitioned space on the disk though?
<clever> depends on how closely they look at things
<clever> some may not notice the shrunken fs, and just assume its fs overhead
<clever> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
<clever> /dev/sda2 488M 95M 358M 22% /boot
<clever> df claims its 488mb
<clever> thats 24mb off!
<colemickens> I was just going to say, it's unexciting and stored next to my Trezor so presumably they'd just be interested in the Trezor and leave my backups, lol
<clever> they will just assume, its fs overhead, if they dont know this low level stuff
<pie_> ugh im probably interested in the scroll but tired
* pie_ copies it for later
<colemickens> The NixOS challenge has turned into writing a autounattend.xml for Windows now
<colemickens> someone save me from myself
<gchristensen> oh jeeze
<colemickens> I'm having a pretty cool weekend. I was on Win10 insiders and upgraded my "Storage Space" to a version that Win10 stable can't read.
<colemickens> Didn't realize until I'd recustomized Windows again. So instead of re-upgrading, migrating data and re-installing again, I've been codifying my Windows tweaks as a powershell script.
<colemickens> with autounattend.xml + the script I should be able to get pretty close to my ideals. NixOS still puts it to shame, of course.
* colemickens shouldn't admit to these amateur-hour mistakes on my real name handle.
<gchristensen> LOL no worries :)
iqubic has joined #nixos-chat
jasongrossman has joined #nixos-chat
LnL has quit [Quit: exit 1]
<gchristensen> hrm. since my / starts empty on each boot, root doesn't have any channels and I can't nixos-rebuild switch --upgrade :D
<iqubic> Your / starts empty?!?! Where does your data live?
<gchristensen> I have a filesystem for /nix, /boot, and /home
<iqubic> And why doesn't root have any channels?!?!
<gchristensen> NixOS is perfectly happy enough to start with an empty /, as long as /nix has the stuff it needs
<iqubic> What sort of bizarre nixos spin are you running?
<gchristensen> and root doesn't have any channels because channels are tracked in each user's home directory, and root's home directory is erased on every boot
<gchristensen> uhh... I decided to do some wacky stuff last week :)
<iqubic> Why do you do this wacky stuff?
<gchristensen> I don't know :|
<gchristensen> iqubic: I think just because I can? nixos makes it easy / safe to do really weird stuff
<clever> gchristensen: uhh, what about /etc/ ?
<gchristensen> it is erased
<clever> your configuration.nix??
<gchristensen> that is in /home/grahamc/projects/grahamc/nixos-config/
<clever> ah
<clever> ah
<gchristensen> I kept my old root dataset around, so I can switch back if I wanted :)
<clever> gchristensen: let me find the line in question...
<clever> nixos/modules/programs/shell.nix: echo "${config.system.defaultChannel} nixos" > "$HOME/.nix-channels"
<clever> gchristensen: this will initialize `nix-channel --list`
<gchristensen> hmm so maybe that could be a activation step?
<clever> 35 # Subscribe the root user to the NixOS channel by default.
<clever> 36 if [ "$USER" = root -a ! -e "$HOME/.nix-channels" ]; then
<clever> its in shellInit, so when you get a root shell via `sudo -i` it should run
<gchristensen> I still just use straight `sudo` or `sudo su` :|
<gchristensen> clever: you might be in to this: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/53901
<{^_^}> #53901 (by grahamc, 3 hours ago, open): WIP: Sign systemd boot EFI images for secure booting.
<clever> gchristensen: neat, but i prefer grub
<gchristensen> sure
<clever> also, secure boot support varies wildly on my machines
<clever> the laptop supports loading custom certs, and even going cert-less, and just operating on a hash whitelist
<gchristensen> definitely so
<clever> so my laptop can just manually whitelist the current grub.efi and not have to deal with any signing
<clever> but in the current state, grub doesnt validate the conf, so you can tell it to run anything
<gchristensen> what about the thing grub passes on to?
<clever> the desktop, secure-boot is either on or off, zero control over certs
<samueldr> grub instead of relying on the EFI secure boot tooling seems to handle validating through its own system
<samueldr> (which makes sense considering EFI is only one of the targets for grub)
<gchristensen> aey
<clever> samueldr: but i suspect you need to customize the grub binary, to bake a cert into it
<clever> to connect the chain of trust properly
<samueldr> yes, but no, but yes
<samueldr> same as you already do when installing grub
<clever> grub-install may also be able to bake one into the binary
<samueldr> cleverer words for what I meant
<clever> line 75 and 79 tell it to trust the hash of the cert
<clever> line 78 is optional, it embeds the entire cert into the ipxe binary
<samueldr> I was thinking into investigating petitboot... just because I like doing things differently; considering the kernel can boot as EFI stub, if petitboot can work as an embedded initrd, I guess it can do a fine job as a bootloader for secure boot
<clever> some targets are NIC boot roms, that are very tight on space
<clever> so ipxe supports downloading the cert at runtime, and basing all trust on the fingerprint inside the cert
<samueldr> and I think it supports EXTLINUX configs, so maybe nixos already works with it
<clever> and line 65 is also optional and can be used seperately, but in this case, is vital to security
<clever> 65 replaces the default script ipxe runs on boot
<lopsided98> clever: have you tried keytool to change the certs on your desktop?
<clever> and line 67 permanently enables requring signatures
<clever> lopsided98: not yet
<clever> gchristensen: i found a neat util on the wine appdb for ventrilo
<clever> gchristensen: it used root and evdev, to sniff the keyboard for the PTT key, then it used the x11 api to fake A being pressed/released, directing the event to the ventrilo window
<gchristensen> wow!
<clever> because wine doesnt support the x11 PTT api's
<clever> wine can only detect the PTT key when any wine window has focus
<samueldr> wow, tiny indeed
<gchristensen> http://incise.org/tinywm.html 50loc
<clever> i prefer ratpoison when i need a light WM
<iqubic> gchristensen: Are there any pictures of TinyWM online?
<dtz> hahaha
<dtz> <3
<dtz> oh i'm responding to backlog sorry
<dtz> O:)
<gchristensen> <3 dtz
<gchristensen> iqubic: I would guess it looks like nothing
drakonis has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<iqubic> gchristensen: Why is that?
<jasongrossman> gchristensen: https://github.com/rtyler/tinywm-ada !
lassulus_ has joined #nixos-chat
lassulus has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
lassulus_ is now known as lassulus
ottidmes has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
<clever> gchristensen: i just noticed, i have 960gig used on my nas /
<clever> gchristensen: what would your trick have eaten? lol
<colemickens> I'm trying to replicate your wiped root with BTRFS :)
<colemickens> After the recent ZoL stuff I've been re-scared off of ZFS on Linux
<colemickens> and my applications are uncritical enough that I can sacrifice to the btrfs gods when it comes to it
<colemickens> the nice thing about making mistakes as often as I do is learning good habits and hygiene around backups (laugh-to-keep-from-crying emoji goes here)
<clever> of note, a lot of apps keep state in /var/
<clever> toxvpn, mysql, postgres, plex
<disasm> yeah, /var on a server is pretty important to have a separate zfs mount for :)
<clever> disasm: funnily enough, chrome tried to delete all my tabs over the weekend, i had to zfs rollback $HOME by ~48 hours to recover them
<disasm> lol, a light floating window manager :) I thought the whole point of light window managers is to not have to use the mouse as much? :)
<clever> disasm: then i discovered, i forgot to commit my latest changes for devops-1131!
<clever> and rollbacks are one-way
<disasm> clever: yikes!
<clever> ive already retyped those changes, and have since moved ~/iohk/ to its own dataset
<clever> so its isolated from $HOME rollbacks now
<disasm> smart :)
<clever> i also enabled dedup
<clever> so git worktrees are even cheaper
<disasm> nice :)
<clever> its also cheaper to let cardano dump chains into ~/iohk/ now
<disasm> yeah, my new laptop said it shipped last week, but when I got back, it still says awaiting shipment in fedex, so I don't have it yet, but I'm planning on setting up the new laptop much more organized (since I'll have 1 TB of disk to work with)
<clever> but now i'm trying to figure out why / on my nas, has 960gig used
<clever> oh, thats why my nas has such a fat /
<clever> theres no /nix dataset, right
Taneb has quit [Quit: I seem to have stopped.]
* clever heads off to bed
<colemickens> !!!
<colemickens> gchristensen: signed bootloaders!?
<colemickens> very cool
pie__ has joined #nixos-chat
pie_ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
jasongrossman has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jasongrossman has joined #nixos-chat
<jasongrossman> like NixOS for three reasons:
<jasongrossman> 1. It's elegant.
<jasongrossman> 2. It has good rollbacks.
<jasongrossman> And, most importantly, 3. It's so much fun when a big channel update works.
<Arahael> And 4. Much nicer dependency management and checking.
<jackdk> 5. Good community, fast reviews and merges
<jasongrossman> I'll accept those, yes.
<colemickens> I'm sort of at a loss. Windows unattend.xml only allows specifying disks and partitions in incrementing index numbers.
<colemickens> nothing specific, no partlabels or uuids. Apparently you can't even rely on ordering between install/removable media and (maybe-)disks. So I don't really know how you can generically automate it at all, really. It seems dependent on machine, harddrive config, possibly the usb used, etc.
endformationage has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.3]
<jasongrossman> colemickens: I feel your pain.
jackdk has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
iqubic has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
<colemickens> clever: in justdoit, why do you add the script to "System.build.justdoit"? Is there something you can by it being a property on system.build ?
jasongrossman has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
MichaelRaskin has quit [Quit: MichaelRaskin]
<sphalerite> my guess would be convenience for building just the script
hedning has joined #nixos-chat
jasongrossman has joined #nixos-chat
jasongrossman has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
jasongrossman has joined #nixos-chat
jasongrossman has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
jasongrossman has joined #nixos-chat
jasongrossman has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
<sphalerite> joepie91++ your rant on VPN services just came in handy again
<{^_^}> joepie91's karma got increased to 4
jasongrossman has joined #nixos-chat
jasongrossman has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jasongrossman has joined #nixos-chat
<joepie91> \o/
jasongrossman has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jasongrossman has joined #nixos-chat
Taneb has joined #nixos-chat
jasongrossman has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jasongrossman has joined #nixos-chat
__Sander__ has joined #nixos-chat
<qyliss^work> =b 54
__monty__ has joined #nixos-chat
<joepie91> gchristensen: FYI: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/18678#issuecomment-433674496 -- wants to write docs, needs pointers
__Sander__ has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
averell has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
averell has joined #nixos-chat
Guest83973 has joined #nixos-chat
Guest83973 is now known as LnL
ottidmes has joined #nixos-chat
<gchristensen> joepie91: that article about your hackerspace is great
<joepie91> indeed :D
<joepie91> so is the hackerspace :P
<Taneb> Almost makes me want to move to the Hague
<gchristensen> joepie91: what was your involvement w.r.t. the initial creation of it?
<joepie91> gchristensen: of the hackerspace? none
<gchristensen> aye
<joepie91> I rolled in later :P
<elvishjerricco> o_O I'm using `nixpkgs.fetchgit` on a repo with submodules. Not only is it unable to find the rev of a submodule that obviously exists IRL, but it's also referencing `/home/will/.ssh` in the build log. How on earth is it getting my home dir? I thought multi-user nix and especially sandboxing eliminated any chance of that
<Taneb> elvishjerricco: iirc fetchers can circumvent the sandbox, if they have an expected hash
<elvishjerricco> Taneb: I know they can get networking, but I'm surprised they can see my home dir
<gchristensen> yes, they still run as nixbldN -- but do have wider access to the FS
<elvishjerricco> gchristensen: But why would my home dir path even show up?
<gchristensen> right, I don't know, that is very bizarre
<elvishjerricco> gchristensen: https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/HcPLHiwx/
<elvishjerricco> This happens while fetching a submodule
<elvishjerricco> gchristensen: Is fetchgit programmed to impurely take some stuff from your home dir for host key verification or something?
<gchristensen> no
<gchristensen> fetchgit can't actually access your ~/.ssh
<elvishjerricco> I'm just trying to figure out how on earth it's coming to the conclusion that `/home/will/.ssh` is what it wants
* joepie91 is refactoring his pile of nixops code
<elvishjerricco> This submodule's url is `git@github.com:ghcjs/ghcjs-base.git`. That's probably wrong.
endformationage has joined #nixos-chat
ekleog has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.2]
ekleog has joined #nixos-chat
<infinisil> 4K display, better CPU, same price
<infinisil> My urge to get it has increased substantially
<gchristensen> oh nice
<sphalerite> fancy fancy
<sphalerite> same price = still expensive :')
<sphalerite> ooh matte 4k screen
<infinisil> I'm thinking of it as paying for freedom, so I don't mind the price too much
<infinisil> :P
<infinisil> And supporting development of FOSS in general
<sphalerite> yeah…
<sphalerite> it's just a lot of money
<samueldr> coreboot!
<samueldr> that's a given, the next portable computer I get *has* to be based off coreboot and allows flashing it
<gchristensen> and actually, pricingand specs wise, it competes with a dell xps
<gchristensen> so while it is a lot of money, there isn't a steep FOSS surcharge on top
<gchristensen> a bit more expensive, but not hugely so
<infinisil> Ah nice to know :o
<samueldr> to me the price looks fine considering the economy of scale
<joepie91> oh, librem is competitive now?
<samueldr> (which they probably can't profit from as much)
<joepie91> this is good news
<gchristensen> fairly, yeah, joepie91
<__monty__> samueldr: Not having to include the OS license price means a bit more margin though, no?
<gchristensen> not $-to-$ competitive, but "yeah, a couple hundred bucks is reasonable" competitive
<__monty__> Or does Dell do windows
<__monty__> -less devices.
<joepie91> well yeah, I did mean the looser definition of flexible
<joepie91> __monty__: yes
<samueldr> they do windowsless devices
<joepie91> eh
<samueldr> but also, at their scale, the licensing price is probably peanuts?
<joepie91> the looser definition of competitive*
<joepie91> I have no idea how I came up with 'flexible'
<joepie91> samueldr: a few years ago it was ~10-40 EUR per license for large vendors
<samueldr> "peanuts"
<joepie91> this is known because you can claim it back in the EU :P
<samueldr> it's not 250
<__monty__> samueldr: Why would microsoft give them a volume deal? What else are they gonna put on it, linux?
<samueldr> ah sure, then, probably 50% of the device price must be windows
<samueldr> microsoft always had volume pricing schemes
<__monty__> It was an honest question. Why would they do this? Cheaper than non-bundled I can see but why 1/5 the price?
<samueldr> hm, honestly a good question
<samueldr> though those licenses have different terms
<gchristensen> so they buy 500,000 of them at a time and microsoft gets the money now, instead of buying them just-in-time and microsoft getting the money later
<samueldr> e.g. linked to a specific unit (device)
<gchristensen> (money now > money later)
<samueldr> while a 250$ windows license can be moved freely* (might have issues with too many moves)
<__monty__> Ok, good reasons. Still, 1/5th?
<joepie91> __monty__: presumably a big reason is that they can motivate vendors to ship Windows that way
<joepie91> which helps their market dominance
<joepie91> Windows licensing fees are almost a formality at this point anyway
<samueldr> I'm surprised that windows 10 hasn't been made freely available at some level, maybe like home up to XGB of ram or something like that
<samueldr> (which still is bad, but eh, closed source software is bad)
<__monty__> It was for a while though.
<samueldr> wasn't it only for upgrades?
<gchristensen> https://imgur.com/gallery/L2Ujilg dear lord
<samueldr> upgrades still cost much less than a full blown license
<__monty__> Oh, yeah, true.
<LnL> what the hell
<samueldr> ah, though, windows licenses ARE free for OEMs for limited capabilities devices, e.g. cheap laptops with less than 4GB of ram and "weak" CPUs
<samueldr> (reportedly)
<gchristensen> LnL: the gif?
<LnL> yeah...
<gchristensen> :D
<infinisil> I see natural selection can still work
<sphalerite> joepie91: you can claim it back in the EU?? Shit, had I known!
<samueldr> I believe it's not EU-specific, but it's done through the OEM vendor and here I haven't been able to claim it; it's (was?) part of the windows EULA
<samueldr> (though it's been years since I bought something with windows so I don't have recent experience)
<gchristensen> how do you avoid it?
<gchristensen> I've been considering buying another laptop just for my consulting work... but, really, hoping someone buys it for me :)
<samueldr> I don't buy new thing with microsoft
<samueldr> I still use my 2014 laptop which is surprisingly good for every tasks (and was mightily cheap)
<samueldr> and the workstation I bought was used (2012-era) so not applicable there
<infinisil> I'm still using my 2012 MacBook Air, which is slowly falling apart
<joepie91> samueldr: it's become part of the EULA only because a court in EU mandated it :)
<samueldr> (and funnily enough, the laptop was bought on the microsoft store at WAY less than elsewhere)
<joepie91> before that it was just a 'suggestion' I believe
<joepie91> but vendors wouldn't actually give you back money
<gchristensen> I didn't think EULAs applied to you, joepie91?
<joepie91> but now you can just contact your hardware vendor and claim back your license cost by indicating that you don't agree to the EULA and don't want to use it
<joepie91> gchristensen: sure they do, they just have no special status, they're license agreements like any other
<joepie91> and so cannot override law etc.
<gchristensen> ah
<jasongrossman> I'm still using a 2012 MacBook Pro, and I have two spares for when it breaks.
<gchristensen> 2012 was a good vintage, for sure
<etu> gchristensen: haha
<gchristensen> 30 minutes in and ... it is annoying.
<__monty__> Uhm, does that garbage collect except for the most recent 10 generations?
<LnL> :D
<gchristensen> it garbage collects everything which doesn't have a GC root
<gchristensen> it doesn't ever remove generations
<__monty__> Then what's the dates about?
<gchristensen> it runs every 10 minutes
<__monty__> Oh.
<__monty__> : /
<LnL> gchristensen: some of the IFD features break when running a gc at the same time
<gchristensen> yeah
<gchristensen> ... yeah.
<__monty__> I wish there was an easier way to remove and collect everything but the last x generations.
<__monty__> I always have to manually list them.
<LnL> __monty__: nix-store --gc has some flags
<__monty__> LnL: But that doesn't handle generations, does it? Didn't see something like a --keep 10 flag or something.
<LnL> --older-than does, but I can't remember what else it can
<__monty__> LnL: Then I still have to check how old each gen is.
<sphalerite> I'd quite like a gc that deletes old store paths (determined by registration date)
<clever> sphalerite: currently, it will prioritize invalid storepaths first, then delete everything in a random order until it hits the quota set by --max-freed
Haskellfant has joined #nixos-chat
lopsided98_ has joined #nixos-chat
nokomprendo has joined #nixos-chat
Taneb has quit [Quit: I seem to have stopped.]
Ralith has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
siraben has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
flokli has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
lopsided98 has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
cocreature has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
Haskellfant is now known as cocreature
Ralith has joined #nixos-chat
flokli has joined #nixos-chat
siraben has joined #nixos-chat
jasongrossman has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
drakonis has joined #nixos-chat
hedning has left #nixos-chat [#nixos-chat]
nokomprendo has quit [Quit: Leaving]
drakonis has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
tilpner has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
iqubic has joined #nixos-chat
Synthetica has joined #nixos-chat
<elvishjerricco> How can I be automatically notified whenever the GHCJS build in nixpkgs becomes broken?
<gchristensen> are you a maintainer?
<elvishjerricco> gchristensen: Thought I was. On further inspection, apparently not :P
<gchristensen> be a maintainer
<samueldr> were notification re-enabled on hydra?
<elvishjerricco> gchristensen: That's just `meta.maintainers = [lib.maintainers.elvishjerricco];` right?
<gchristensen> yeah, elvishjerricco
<gchristensen> samueldr: I think so?
<samueldr> this will need to be closed if so https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-org-configurations/issues/51
<{^_^}> nixos-org-configurations#51 (by timokau, 23 weeks ago, open): Re-enable email notifications
jackdk has joined #nixos-chat