<gchristensen>
a new and exciting CEO who specialises in mergers and acquisitions
drakonis has joined #nixos-chat
cjpbirkbeck has joined #nixos-chat
drakonis has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.4]
tilpner has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
tilpner has joined #nixos-chat
yorick has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
<andi->
maybe he will ensure my bucket will be deleted :-)
yorick has joined #nixos-chat
<joepie91>
gchristensen: well, that seems to explain a lot about why DO suddenly selects a $40/mo instance as a default and hides the cheaper options...
<eyJhb>
But isn't this too new to have anything to do with that?
<joepie91>
eyJhb: more that it seems to suggest a shared cause :)
<joepie91>
namely; customer acquisition phase is over, time to sell the lot
<joepie91>
(and so the numbers probably need propping up)
<eyJhb>
I don't hope so, I only have one provider interface for my platform! I don't want to code another right now.
Jackneill has joined #nixos-chat
<joepie91>
eyJhb: good example of why I don't want to build against specific providers' platforms :P at least DO is fairly interchangeable
cjpbirkbeck has quit [Quit: Quitting now.]
endformationage has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.5]
<eyJhb>
joepie91: well, that is quite hard not to, if I actually want to get anything running :p But I have a interface I just need to implement to change it to something else
<mgdm>
gchristensen: awww no. I just moved a few things over there
<averell>
will probably take months to really start to suck... :)
arahael1 is now known as Arahael
veske has joined #nixos-chat
<eyJhb>
Tbh. If you use DOs API on a regular basis, then it already sucks. And 1 out of every 10 website load, I get "something went wrong" pages
ajirx has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ajirx has joined #nixos-chat
ajirx has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
__monty__ has joined #nixos-chat
veske has quit [Quit: This computer has gone to sleep]
andi- has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
andi- has joined #nixos-chat
andi- has quit [Excess Flood]
andi- has joined #nixos-chat
andi- has quit [Excess Flood]
andi- has joined #nixos-chat
ajirx has joined #nixos-chat
andi- has quit [Excess Flood]
andi- has joined #nixos-chat
ajirx has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
andi- has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
andi- has joined #nixos-chat
Jackneill has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
andi- has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
psyanticy has joined #nixos-chat
andi- has joined #nixos-chat
Jackneill has joined #nixos-chat
noonien has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
waleee-cl has joined #nixos-chat
Jackneill has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
Jackneill has joined #nixos-chat
<eyJhb>
Anyone good with Elasticsearch/Logstash etc.?
<eyJhb>
Or grok I guess?
<gchristensen>
I have... used those... at one point
<eyJhb>
Can I pm you gchristensen ?
<gchristensen>
sure
__Sander__ has joined #nixos-chat
<eyJhb>
I seem to remember some way of "promoting" at /dev/pts/x to root, am I completely wrong?
<eyJhb>
s/at/a/
drakonis has joined #nixos-chat
<Gilfoyle->
gchristensen: Suddenly glad I didn't put in for tht DO job months back
<gchristensen>
heh
<gchristensen>
yeah :)
endformationage has joined #nixos-chat
Gilfoyle- is now known as Church-
drakonis_ has joined #nixos-chat
drakonis has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
drakonis has joined #nixos-chat
drakonis_ has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
__Sander__ has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
<__monty__>
Hmm, joepie91, did you consider krops? I'm interested in how it differs from morph.
<srhb>
__monty__: Morph is basically a wrapper around nix-copy-closure and the normal activation scripts, so it's more or less NixOps without the provisioning. :)
<aminechikhaoui>
isn't that basically the nixops none backend ?
<__monty__>
And also what krops seems to be doing?
<__monty__>
aminechikhaoui: I think the difference with nixops is the "stateless" feature? I figure nixOps keeps a database of hosts and their version around or something?
<aminechikhaoui>
ha, ok then it makes sense
<srhb>
Yes, there's no state in morph at all.
<__monty__>
Nor krops. But I want to know the difference between morph and krops : >
<srhb>
Yeah, I was just trying to write down what I remember off the top of my head :P
<srhb>
One thing that I remember krops does is be able to deploy the source on the target itself innately
<srhb>
Meaning, you can lose your deploy sources and not have a bad day.
<srhb>
Oh, and per-machine nixpkgs sources are not in morph yet I think..
<__monty__>
I guess what I'm wondering about mostly is "Why morph?" given that krops already existed.
<srhb>
morph actually existed a long time before then in some internal shape.
<__monty__>
Is it just nih-nixops started around the same time and released at some random point?
<srhb>
... yes :P
<__monty__>
Ok, then we're back to what are the differences so I can make an educated decision.?
<srhb>
So I wrote the first version in bash, the second in haskell, then left the company and they did a much nicer version in go because none of them felt very confident with haskell. :)
<srhb>
I wrote the first version because I wanted zero state.
<srhb>
the go version is what's called morph
<srhb>
The first version was literally ./deploy.sh... I think the second was "nix-deploy" or something along those lines.
<srhb>
What are your needs anyway?
<__monty__>
Oh, you came up with morph? Cool beans.
<srhb>
No, I would definitely not take the honor for that, morph is much nicer than what I wrote ;-)
<__monty__>
My needs are enough knowledge to take over the world : )
<srhb>
heheh
<__monty__>
don't have a direct use. Though in the longer term I'd like to pivot a server from arch to nixos.
<__monty__>
Would also love to handle VPSs with some sort of nix deploy tool.
<srhb>
morph and nixops are probably the most interchangable..
<gchristensen>
I see pivoting X to NixOS as short term. long term, providers should offer NixOS
<srhb>
Because morph basically builds on the same machines-evaluation internally
<__monty__>
Mister big measuring stick : p
<srhb>
So if you ever want provisioning, it might be slightly easier to go morph->(possibly nixops)
<srhb>
Then again, it's all just nix, so switching between either of them is going to be a walk in the park.
<gchristensen>
srhb: might be interesting to see if morph could take advantage somehow of the upcoming pluginization of nixops
<srhb>
gchristensen: I'll be sure to pass that on. :-)
<srhb>
I have been following the PR.
<pie_>
why do people seem to be building good stuff in go but PL people hate the language
<srhb>
Fashion...
<pie_>
i mean i know why pl people hate it, just that dichotomy bothers me :D
<srhb>
Plus it did resolve some very real distribution/build issues that we tend to forget about in nix land.
<gchristensen>
well on the left hand you have "clearyl people can get stuff done in it"
<gchristensen>
and on the right hand you have people who don't like how people have gotten things done
<srhb>
gchristensen: That's the devil's hand
<srhb>
(The left one...)
<pie_>
srhb: lol gchristensen: yes
<adisbladis>
srhb: I like the devil
<pie_>
gchristensen: im the kind of guy that wants the best of both :( (so i never get anything done)
<infinisil>
You can build bad stuff in good languages, and you can build good stuff in bad languages
<srhb>
#nixos-$foo: The only place on the internet that will always make militant agnosticism a thing. :P
<infinisil>
There's not much of a connection between how good a language is and how good the thing is you build out of it
<adisbladis>
I think Go is elegant in a way
<adisbladis>
"militant agnosticism" <3
<adisbladis>
I will hit you with a trout until you also don't know what I don't know
<pie_>
:D
<srhb>
^^
drakonis has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
drakonis has joined #nixos-chat
drakonis has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
<eyJhb>
Well.. Go has good performance and easy to use, so it is when people start using Go as they would Python that .. SOme get unhappy
<eyJhb>
And I am a part of that issue!
drakonis has joined #nixos-chat
drakonis_ has joined #nixos-chat
<__monty__>
I'd expect people to mind that less than using haskell as if it's python : >
drakonis has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
<cransom>
go as python, doesn't bother me as much as people using go as a bash replacement. or just to rewrite a tool that already exists because that tool isn't go, and they think it should be go.
drakonis_ has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
<eyJhb>
any language as bash is a problem. I have done that before.. Writing something in Python that could be done in 4 lines of bash...
<eyJhb>
But yeah, the last part is true. But sometimes it is rewritten in Go, as it might be easier to maintian
<__monty__>
Went to a go meetup once. Comments about haskell were *not* friendly. While I've personally never experienced the "ivory tower" people claim haskellers inhabit.
<eyJhb>
Setting the alarm for tomorrow, and seeing if I slept right now, I would get around 8 hours of sleep. It is 19.00..
<__monty__>
Ouch.
<infinisil>
__monty__: What's the "ivory tower"?
<eyJhb>
Yeah, I am in-between of just staying up, or trying to go to bed early
<eyJhb>
infinisil: `a state of privileged seclusion or separation from the facts and practicalities of the real world.`
<infinisil>
I see
<infinisil>
So just the standard "haskell isn't practical for real-world programs" :)
webster23_ has joined #nixos-chat
<__monty__>
Yes, not practical and writing it's like solving a rubik's cube, hard but pointless.
<srhb>
I think ivory tower is specifically aimed at the academia-ness of Haskell in this instance.
<__monty__>
Probably, but it's always posited as a bad thing. It's never gotten in my way, learning and writing haskell.
<averell>
i still remember when the haskell "killer app" was darcs. now i guess it's pandoc.
waleee-cl has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
<__monty__>
Or Sigma.
Jackneill has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<andi->
the new twitter allows pasting of images via ctrl-v and it will show up in the editor... It doesn't upload them when you send the tweet (╯° °)╯︵ ┻━┻)
<__monty__>
Hmm, thought I'd gotten a compose key working on macOS, mysteriously doesn't work for some compositions : /
<srhb>
__monty__: I recently was so happy to get it working until I realize that chromium completely disregards my xcompose and makes up some shit, somehow.
<__monty__>
Wat?
<gchristensen>
andi-: wat
<__monty__>
Oh, chromium, you keep surprising us with your boneheaded misfeatures.
<__monty__>
gchristensen: Twinsies : >
<andi->
gchristensen: yes, paste an image into the editor and try :-)
<manveru>
hmm, turned out replacing all the functionality of hakyll (i was using) took about 300 LoC in nix :)
<infinisil>
manveru: Can I see those 300 LoC?
<infinisil>
Really wondering what kind of things you implemented with it :o
<manveru>
:)
<manveru>
it's not pure nix anymore
<manveru>
but i tried to get as granular compilation as possible
<manveru>
will rewrite that in a compiled language, since it's the slowest part of the build, but since nix caches it it's not too painful
drakonis_ has joined #nixos-chat
<manveru>
sorry, this is not offtopic enough for this channel anyway :)
<__monty__>
Hmm, looks to me like you could just have used a binary for pandoc though.
<Church->
hakyll is a site generator
<__monty__>
Yep.
endformationage has joined #nixos-chat
Jackneill has joined #nixos-chat
Jackneill has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
drakonis has joined #nixos-chat
lopsided98 has joined #nixos-chat
webster23_ has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
<kalbasit>
Going through a memory hole here. What is the term we use to refer to Nix's method definition? As in `add = x: y: x + y` and `add5 = add 5`
<infinisil>
kalbasit: How would a function definition have a different name than a non-function definition?
<kalbasit>
infinisil: I wish I know what I'm looking for lol. It's a functional programming concept regarding partial functions
<infinisil>
Ah, partial application?
<infinisil>
currying?
<kalbasit>
Yes!!!
<kalbasit>
damn it, thanks!!
<infinisil>
Wait, which one?
<infinisil>
Np :)
<kalbasit>
Currying
<infinisil>
Ahh
endformationage has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.5]
<ashkitten>
steam runtime mirrors seem to be 404ing
<ashkitten>
actually nvm, it's the steampowered repo itself that is 404ing
<ashkitten>
maybe the steam runtime should be updated?
<ashkitten>
i'll try
<__monty__>
kalbasit: Neither of the things you wrote involves currying.
<ashkitten>
when fetching patches from patchwork.kernel.org in my configuration, i'm running into discrepancies between the expected and received hashes
<ashkitten>
but if i do nix-prefetch-url beforehand it works fine
<infinisil>
The `curry` function is not misnamed apparently :)
<__monty__>
Yeah, it's one of those weird things. Like how everyone talks about partial application but neither haskell nor nix actually have partial application.
<infinisil>
__monty__: Huh, how do they not?
<__monty__>
infinisil: Btw, technically `curry` doesn't curry in haskell. It goes from a single-argument function to a single-argument function : >
<__monty__>
You can't partially apply anything in either language.
drakonis_ has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
<__monty__>
You can apply single-argument functions to single arguments. And sometimes you get a function as a result.
<__monty__>
But there's nothing partial about that.
<infinisil>
I think that's what people mean when they talk about partial application
<infinisil>
In such functional languages at least
<infinisil>
__monty__: What else would partial application be?
drakonis_ has joined #nixos-chat
<__monty__>
Well it can only exist in languages that have multiple argument functions.
<__monty__>
I know there's not much pratical difference. But the devil's in the details.
<infinisil>
Ah I see
<__monty__>
Things like python's partial and java's bindTo are what I'd call "real" partial application.
<__monty__>
You can probably find out more about this from people like ski over in #haskell : )
<__monty__>
nn, infinisil, peeps
<infinisil>
Night :)
__monty__ has quit [Quit: leaving]
<ldlework>
Some languages have this feature of defining multi-parameter functions as unary functions which return functions automatically
<ldlework>
ML's like F#
<ldlework>
And so partial application is intrinsic to the language such that calling a function declared with multiple parameters with only some of the required parameters will always result in a unary function that is waiting to be further applied
<ldlework>
I think that __monty__'s distinction is one without a difference
<ldlework>
Most people writing in ML's would conceive of this mechanism as "partial application" or at least "automatic currying"
<infinisil>
ldlework: That game seems perfect for when you need to stress yourself out even more!
<ldlework>
i went to the comments but no one seemed to also be thinking it would be a super cool asynchrnous VR-vs-PC game
<ldlework>
Imagine if you could only chase the other player around by grabbing the ground and pulling yourself along
<infinisil>
Hehe yeah
<colemickens>
so is there something wrong with cache.nixos.org or am I somehow have extremely bad luck on both hotel wifi and my independent cell phone tether?
<colemickens>
How the fuck do I change my Mac address and not have NM immediately change it back
<colemickens>
I just did it 5 minutes ago and now it won't stick
<ivan>
colemickens: edit it in networkmanager?
<colemickens>
I guess. `ip link set addr <foo>` works too as long as you dont RE-connect from NM. which is lovely.
<colemickens>
also, I forgot how unimpressed I am with nmtui, managing to break my terminal after exit, ignoring Esc in half the places, inconsistent menus.
<colemickens>
wew lord I am having a rough time with this.
<colemickens>
I would connect to a wireguard tunnel but I know that's going to make me insanely less happy because I've been down that road before.