<s1ng0c> no, I just wanna try
<s1ng0c> let me check 24c9b05ac53e422f1af81a156f1fd58499eb27fb
<samueldr> do you have a pinephone with 3GB of ram?
<samueldr> you will need a different u-boot build, https://github.com/NixOS/mobile-nixos/pull/199
<{^_^}> mobile-nixos#199 (by TilCreator, 11 weeks ago, open): PinePhone: Switch u-boot to pine64-org fork
<s1ng0c> no, mine ver 1.1
<samueldr> ah, then it should work fine with the default things
<s1ng0c> (y)
<s1ng0c> hope so :D
<samueldr> ah, so it looks like they changed the name of the function
<s1ng0c> for some reasons, try to reproduce successful build from Hydra but got: 24c9b05ac53e422f1af81a156f1fd58499eb27fb
<s1ng0c> sys/rpicamsrc/meson.build:30:4: ERROR: Problem encountered: Could not find bcm_host.h
<samueldr> opened #252 with clues for future-self
<{^_^}> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/252 (by matejc, 7 years ago, merged): xfce4-notifyd: add new package
<samueldr> are you sure it's building against 24c9b05ac53e422f1af81a156f1fd58499eb27fb?
<samueldr> opened mobile-nixos#252 *
<{^_^}> https://github.com/NixOS/mobile-nixos/issues/252 (by samueldr, 42 seconds ago, open): error: attribute 'selectBySystem' missing
<s1ng0c> checking it out
<samueldr> because that's one of the issues from later on with cross-compilation IIRC
<colemickens> Asmadeus: Getting iPXE for aarch64 is easier said than done though. It just looks much simpler to do uboot->grub->kernel since I don't have to go figure out how syslinux builds into ipxe :S
<s1ng0c> previously I clone with depth=1 hence need to clone again
<s1ng0c> *cloned
<samueldr> next time,
<samueldr> `git fetch --unshallow` can do that
<s1ng0c> oh, will try next time :D, not really good at git :(
<s1ng0c> seem issue gone
* colemickens hopes that anyone who thinks my plan is dumb will shout
<samueldr> colemickens: ipxe -> u-boot ?
<gchristensen> as long as you have a nice amount of ram and, yeah
<gchristensen> if it is a pi and you install a bootloader to the disk you'll have a hard time netbooting later
<samueldr> gchristensen: YMMV with the 4
<samueldr> since it's user-configurable in the EEPROM
rajivr has joined #nixos-aarch64
<colemickens> I thought rpi4 was just PXE so I was going to PXE to uboot, since iPXE isn't built for aarch64 in nixpkgs.
<samueldr> you can change the boot order in the eeprom, so things are extremely not-declarative
<samueldr> I see
<samueldr> then use u-boot's whatever for netbooting grub UEFI I guess?
<colemickens> Something like that, I guess.
<samueldr> is there a reason for the grub indirection?
<colemickens> this prompted my question last night of why u-boot doesn't support http?
<samueldr> (I didn't ingest the backlogs today)
<colemickens> nah, don't expect that, just restating :)
<colemickens> just wondering aloud really
<samueldr> (been uncharacteristically offline these past days)
<samueldr> I know it doesn't look like it :)
<samueldr> so what's the reason for the grub indirection?
<colemickens> samueldr: honestly I stuck grub2 in there because it was easy to find examples of how to get grub to load a big initrd over http.
<samueldr> ah
<samueldr> any reason is fine, I didn't know if you had considered straight u-boot
<colemickens> if u-boot could pull over something other than tftp... or if I knew how to configure extlinux, maybe I'd pursue that more?
<samueldr> what about tianocore?
<colemickens> I'm really tempted to just do that, too.
<colemickens> stick it on an SD card, configure the HTTP server to pull from, call it a day.
<samueldr> in my experience with the pi 3, tianocore is soooooo much better
<samueldr> I haven't tried it back on the 4
<colemickens> for some reason I'm doing that thing where I really want zero-storage devices attached to it, but I'm probably just being silly.
<samueldr> treat that SD card as if it was a bios EEPROM and forget about it :)
<gchristensen> the traditional pxe flow is (bad pxe) -tftp-> (ipxe) -http(s)-> real-os
<colemickens> it worked well enough a couple months ago. I actually had it netbooted as well, but I couldn't really figure out how to get my router to advertise the right DHCP option for HTTP-UEFI boot.
<samueldr> and bug the raspberry pi foundation for actually useful EEPROM space
<gchristensen> since rolling out (i)pxe updates is tricky, doing an initial bootstrap via tftp is quite common
<colemickens> gchristensen: I'm worried getting ipxe on aarch64 will be a time-suck, but I've not looked into it seriously yet.
<gchristensen> should not be hard
dao_ has joined #nixos-aarch64
dao_ has left #nixos-aarch64 [#nixos-aarch64]
s1ng0c_ has joined #nixos-aarch64
s1ng0c_ has quit [Client Quit]
s1ng0c has quit []
ramram has joined #nixos-aarch64
s1ng0c has joined #nixos-aarch64
s1ng0c has quit [Client Quit]
s1ng0c has joined #nixos-aarch64
<clever> colemickens: i know more about the pi netboot if you still have questions
* colemickens looks up the syslinux maintainer and....
<samueldr> tell me it's not me
<samueldr> hi
<samueldr> it me
<samueldr> note that syslinux is totally unrelated to u-boot's syslinux support
<samueldr> except for the file format
<colemickens> I decided to go the "try to get iPXE" working route. It seems like less moving parts and I got a "should not be hard" from a reliable source.
<clever> colemickens: for the pi4, i believe it will just blindly fetch $prefix/start4.elf or start4.elf from the next-server defined in dhcp, but only if the dhcp server responds with a special tag
<colemickens> and as far as I know and cant tell, ipxe wants syslinux. I did open an issue to track, might've tagged you in it.
<clever> [clever@amd-nixos:~/apps/rpi/lk]$ cat ~/apps/rpi/rpi-eeprom/firmware/beta/bootconf.txt
<clever> TFTP_IP=192.168.2.15
<colemickens> clever: I know about / have those parts working
<colemickens> clever: I want to chain to ipxe though.
<clever> but you can also force it to a certain IP in the eeprom cfg
<colemickens> and need an ipxe build :)
<clever> start4.elf will then read config.txt and kernel.img from the same server+prefix
<clever> and kernel.img can be any arm kernel, so it could be an ipxe build
<samueldr> I think the pi4 added support for more lookups
<samueldr> per-macaddr or per serial?
<clever> it defaults to using the serial as $prefix
<samueldr> not that it really matters for the needs here
<clever> but you can change that in the eeprom bootconf.txt
<clever> you can also just hard-code a custom prefix
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
<clever> -rw-r--r-- 1 clever users 2.2M Nov 8 11:45 /home/clever/apps/rpi/firmware/boot/start4.elf
<clever> samueldr: also, we currently cant really get a usable ipxe fully on-board
<clever> the eeprom is 512kb, and the start4.elf is 2.2mb
<clever> i did have a ticket open about loading start4.elf and kernel.img from a second spi chip on the gpio header
<clever> but it got derailed by complaints about sd card reliability, and they locked the ticket
<samueldr> :/
<colemickens> clever: to make sure I'm not missing something, do you have a ipxe built for aarch64?
<clever> colemickens: ive never tried ipxe outside of x86
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
<clever> nix-repl> pkgsCross.aarch64-multiplatform.ipxe
<clever> error: --- ThrownError ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- nix
<clever> Package ‘syslinux-unstable-20190207’ in /home/clever/apps/nixpkgs-hasura/pkgs/os-specific/linux/syslinux/default.nix:95 is not supported on ‘aarch64-linux’, refusing to evaluate.
<gchristensen> :/
monk has left #nixos-aarch64 ["Error from remote client"]
monk has joined #nixos-aarch64
<clever> /nix/store/9yapmh2s4z7dz07zdpd626329bcqh1p0-bash-4.4-p23/bin/bash: gcc: command not found
<clever> builder for '/nix/store/rincr7wkfjk45h54vrnq7b87igczl4bn-syslinux-unstable-20190207-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu.drv' failed with exit code 2
<s1ng0c> @samueldr boot screen shown at 1st boot only
<s1ng0c> dont know why :(
<s1ng0c> PP v1.1, LCD not on from 2nd boot
<s1ng0c> any clue?
<s1ng0c> BTW: don't know if there is any issue by change USB OTG to host/otg mode on u-boot for pinephone?
<s1ng0c> I need this mode to let pinephone connect to eth via usb doggle
<samueldr> nothing specific to mobile nixos
<samueldr> btw, I will be frank, pretty much nothing is "ready" in stage-2 for end-users
<samueldr> so depending on whether you want to fix things up yourself, you may prefer temporarily running something else
<samueldr> something that at least claims to be ready for daily use :)
<samueldr> as for the LCD not working on second boot... I really have no clue, you'd have to go through logs
<s1ng0c> ok then
tilpner_ has joined #nixos-aarch64
cole-h has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
tilpner has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
tilpner_ is now known as tilpner
patagonicus has quit [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
patagonicus has joined #nixos-aarch64
bdju has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
bdju has joined #nixos-aarch64
s1ng0c has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<thefloweringash> Emil Karlson: no gpu, just headless. I use the vendor kernel at version 4.19.68. mainline has some support as of 5.5, but I'm waiting for pcie support
red[evilred] has joined #nixos-aarch64
<red[evilred]> sphalerite (IRC) I just poked solid run. I'll let you know if I hear anything back.
ramram has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
<angerman> does anyone have a creative idea how to get `mkimage` available during the kernel build?
<angerman> armbian does some device tree overlay building during the kernel build and it needs mkimage for that.
<samueldr> but do we need to do it at that step?
h0m1 has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
<angerman> samueldr: it's one of their kernel patches m(
<samueldr> can you link to the patch?
h0m1 has joined #nixos-aarch64
<samueldr> ugh, I hate "unsourced" patches
<samueldr> no commit bodies
<samueldr> no origin
<samueldr> just a raw patch
<angerman> yea. It's lovely.
<samueldr> great
<samueldr> that was approximately what was going to be my next question
<angerman> I think I'll just try to drop both patches... let's see.
<angerman> who needs overlays anyway, right?!
<samueldr> that's what I would call "vendor-like" customizations from armbian :/
<samueldr> that readme helps
<samueldr> I believe it is needed *if* you are in the armbian ecosystem
<samueldr> that doesn't look like how mainline Linux does things generally
<samueldr> at worst you'll be missing the ability to deal with the listed features I think
<samueldr> which could still be taken out of the kernel built and dealt with as another step
orivej has quit [Quit: orivej]
<angerman> samueldr: right, I was just going to ask if I couldn't just build them separately and laod that overlay.
<samueldr> eeeexactly
<angerman> All I want to see is really if the armbian jumble of patches and kernel parameters makes the sdcard come up
<samueldr> in fact, that's what they do
<samueldr> only, they do it quite close to the kernel build, which to my opinion isn't great
<samueldr> but my opinion is that the kernel vendoring of device trees is a mistake
<angerman> I have for the helios64 narrowed down what causes the sd card (and emmc) not to come up.
<samueldr> while I do understand why they did that... some vendors are beyond terrible
<samueldr> it's just not great to have the kernel basically dictate stuff about the platform, that really should be part of its own independent firmware
<samueldr> angerman: great
<angerman> The device tree from the upstream kernel *works*, the helios provided device tree, when used with vanilla 5.8 from nixpkgs, fails to bring up the sdcard.
<angerman> so something between those two device trees is significantly different, that it stops the sd card from coming up. Now I have very little knowledge about devicetrees :-/
<samueldr> FDT stands for flattened device tree, which is basically a .dtb file
<samueldr> .dts is the source (duh) and .dtbo is a method to make a "binary patch" that can be loaded atop an FDT
<samueldr> same... label(?) for the other patch
<angerman> the second one though doesn't provide enough info for the hdd controller to come up.
<samueldr> one of the worst problem with device trees is that there is no glossary to look up terms
<angerman> yea, they are *almost* identical :-/
<samueldr> yeah
<samueldr> I don't see what would do it
<angerman> I need to find a faster way to iterate on a device tree.
<samueldr> it might be higher up in the topology of the board, where it affects both
<angerman> basically taking the one that works; and slowly adding more to it, until it stops working.
<angerman> but building the full image, burning it to an sdcard, and rebooting is ... a bit slow.
<samueldr> the one from linux-rockchip.git has no mention of sata at all in it
<samueldr> the other has the LEDs defined
<samueldr> ah, it's also pretty well defined in the linux-rockchip patch what is known to work
<angerman> yea, so right now, you can either boot from the sdcard and have no sata controller, or ... well yuou can't boot :D
<samueldr> btw
<angerman> samueldr: am I missing something? I don't see the sata ones :-/
<samueldr> it's not part of the upstream kernel patch at all AFAICT
<angerman> the armbian one is provided by the kobol folks
<samueldr> yeah
orivej has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
Darkmatter66_ has joined #nixos-aarch64
Darkmatter66 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<angerman> Looks like my armbian kernel built. Should be able to test after lunch. If that doesn’t work, I’ll try the sd load/unload patch
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
cole-h has joined #nixos-aarch64
red[evilred] has quit [Quit: Idle timeout reached: 10800s]
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
<angerman> whee, that worked.
<angerman> so it's probably something with our kernel config.
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
Darkmatter66_ has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
<Asmadeus> colemickens: didn't read full backlog but yeah I only have experience with aarch64 uefi for which ipxe works fine, that said it should probably be possible to build a specific ipxe.lkrn (which should chain after uboot easily) for aarch64 as well
<Asmadeus> from a quick read aarch64 doesn't support the "full image" mode with all drivers because all drivers aren't supported, but if you make something fairly minimal with just what you need it works well
orivej has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
justan0theruser has joined #nixos-aarch64
monk has left #nixos-aarch64 ["Disconnected: Replaced by new connection"]
justanotheruser has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
monk has joined #nixos-aarch64
zupo has joined #nixos-aarch64
zupo_ has joined #nixos-aarch64
zupo has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
<patagonicus> Sigh. Of course it failed with a similar error in a related module. Time to build this kernel manually and fix the imports as I go along.
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
adamzivcak has joined #nixos-aarch64
adamzivcak has left #nixos-aarch64 [#nixos-aarch64]
zupo_ has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
cole-h has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
<angerman> Alright, I pushed the armbian kernel changes for the helios64 to https://github.com/angerman/nixos-docker-sd-image-builder, effectively making nixos use the armbian configured kernel for rockchip64. This works on my helios. What doesn't work are the fans, so I'll need to figure that one out still.
<angerman> I guess https://wiki.kobol.io/helios64/pwm/#udev-rules, and the following needs to be added to the nixos config as well.
<angerman> Someone complained about the fan noise... and got Noctua NF-A8 PWMs. wow.
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
Darkmatter66 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
orivej has joined #nixos-aarch64
zupo has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
zupo has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
zupo has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
justan0theruser has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
zupo has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
zupo has joined #nixos-aarch64
orivej has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
Darkmatter66 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
monk has left #nixos-aarch64 ["Error from remote client"]
monk has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
orivej has joined #nixos-aarch64
lukego has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
lukego has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
<{^_^}> #106304 (by colemickens, 14 hours ago, open): iPXE: enable for aarch64-linux (requires syslinux for aarch-linux as well)
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
adamzivcak1 has joined #nixos-aarch64
adamzivcak1 has left #nixos-aarch64 [#nixos-aarch64]
adamzivcak has joined #nixos-aarch64
zupo has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
zupo has joined #nixos-aarch64
NickHu has joined #nixos-aarch64
NickHu has joined #nixos-aarch64
NickHu has quit [Changing host]
justanotheruser has joined #nixos-aarch64
monk has left #nixos-aarch64 ["Error from remote client"]
monk has joined #nixos-aarch64
FRidh has joined #nixos-aarch64
monk has left #nixos-aarch64 ["Error from remote client"]
monk has joined #nixos-aarch64
cole-h has joined #nixos-aarch64
FRidh has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
Darkmatter66 has joined #nixos-aarch64
monk has left #nixos-aarch64 ["Error from remote client"]
adamzivcak has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
monk has joined #nixos-aarch64
rajivr has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
Darkmatter66_ has joined #nixos-aarch64
Darkmatter66 has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
Darkmatter66_ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Darkmatter66 has joined #nixos-aarch64
adamzivcak has joined #nixos-aarch64
adamzivcak1 has joined #nixos-aarch64
adamzivcak has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
adamzivcak1 has left #nixos-aarch64 [#nixos-aarch64]
adamzivcak has joined #nixos-aarch64
adamzivcak has left #nixos-aarch64 [#nixos-aarch64]
sds2 has quit [Quit: sds2]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
sds2 has quit [Client Quit]
sds2 has joined #nixos-aarch64
zupo has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
zupo has joined #nixos-aarch64
shyim has joined #nixos-aarch64
shyim has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
Acou_Bas- has joined #nixos-aarch64
Acou_Bass has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
monk has left #nixos-aarch64 ["Error from remote client"]
zupo has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
Acou_Bas- has quit [Quit: ZNC 1.8.1 - https://znc.in]
Acou_Bass has joined #nixos-aarch64
<cirno-999> is it legal to talk about armv7 here? :P
<simpson> Yes, especially if you have the gumption, patience, and machines for building your own packages.
<cirno-999> I don't ;p maybe in the future ;)
<simpson> I just mean that there's no community armv7 builders for most boards; there's not much publically cached.
monk has joined #nixos-aarch64
<cirno-999> just wondering why "(nix-on-droid) would not work on 32-bit ARM devices and it's not an easy feat to pull off."
<simpson> Because 32-bit ARM is hard to work with. So is aarch64, but the very fact that I can say "aarch64" and not "assorted 64-bit ARM arches" is a massive part of why.
<simpson> That said, https://github.com/nixos/mobile-nixos can support armv7 phones, in theory. Possibly in practice too, but I haven't had the patience to follow through.
Raito_Bezarius has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
monk has left #nixos-aarch64 ["Error from remote client"]
Raito_Bezarius has joined #nixos-aarch64
<cirno-999> it would be hard to get a compatible armv7 device.
<cirno-999> aarch64 at least has the pinephone
<simpson> Oh, it's possible to add devices to that list. I don't have anything currently supported; I'd be finishing/adding the hammerhead support started in https://github.com/NixOS/mobile-nixos/pull/24 or https://github.com/NixOS/mobile-nixos/pull/144
<{^_^}> mobile-nixos#24 (by 0x4A6F, 1 year ago, open): [WIP] device: add lg-hammerhead
<{^_^}> mobile-nixos#144 (by thefloweringash, 30 weeks ago, open): lg-hammerhead: init
<simpson> It's just so much time that has to go into it, and I have so little patience this year. :T
veleiro` has joined #nixos-aarch64
<cirno-999> I hope I can help someday, it is such an interesting subject to me, unfortunately I don't have a lot of knowledge yet.
veleiro has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]