<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: Interesting, I don't see sameuldr point if it's a bridge; you are not forced to engage with Discord if you don't want to.
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: (I could see the claim if it's *only* Discord)
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: > which is that... discord is not good to engage with as a proprietary platform
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: > setheron: that talk was about the _previous_ wiki
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: @samueldr[freenode]#0000 Oh wonderful, thank you for the link
<samueldr>
having the bridge present _is_ engaging with discord
<samueldr>
and it's a terrible interface to work with
<samueldr>
allowing the bridge to be present is tacitly approving of Discord as an official channel
<samueldr>
and this is a discussion that should happen in a less nich place than #nixos-wiki
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: terrible interface from point of view of a chat-user or integration author?
<samueldr>
of IRC user
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: re: Wiki
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: is the current incarnation that of _fadenb_ it lists ?
<samueldr>
yes
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: sure i'm just chatting with you.
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: I don't find the fact it's unofficial yet integrated confusing.
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: In the same vein that nixpkgs can allow unfree software; it's a pragmatic approach but the default (official) stance is free software.
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]:
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: Helping foster any community seems positive in any platform.
<{\_\}>
setheron[discord]: For instance I like to answer questions on StackOverflow vs Discourse.
<samueldr>
there is a difference, since having the link present shows an obvious bias into making it an accepted platform
<samueldr>
so I totally disagree
<samueldr>
and this is not where the discussion should take place
<samueldr>
it should be on #nixos-dev where more contributors are present
<samueldr>
there is only a microscopic subset of contributors here in #nixos-wiki