<nh2[m]>
I'm a bit at a loss btw where we track infra issues, sometimes there are notifications on top of https://status.nixos.org/, sometimes Hydra issues are pinned in the nixpkgs issue tracker, but I feel like it's pretty ad-hoc.
<nh2[m]>
It would be nicer if there was a dedicated issue tracker for this, vs reading logs of multiple IRC channels (unless there already is one of course).
<nh2[m]>
For example, 20.09 doesn't seem to have Thunderbird or Libreoffice currently, and for Thunderbird it's because of some SSH error to a builder machine: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/129301019
cole-h has joined #nixos-infra
<samueldr>
at first glance it looks like the job just missed being built
<samueldr>
not sure if there is a larger issue here
<samueldr>
I think users sometimes do report it to the nixpkgs tracker when a package has unexpectedly failed on Hydra
<samueldr>
I don't have an answer
<nh2[m]>
samueldr: IMO unless something speaks _against_ it, we should just use the nixpkgs repo with an `build-infa` label, and write on the top of status.nixos.org and hydra.nixos.org something like "If a package is not building due to what looks like an infrastructure issue, check or report it [here](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%220.kind%3A+build-infra%22)" and extend the Github issue
<nh2[m]>
templates by one for "Stuff isn't building on Hydra"
<samueldr>
I don't have a strong opinion about that
<nh2[m]>
I'll wait a while and see if anybody pops up saying that this would be bad, if nobody does I may go make some PRs for that
<gchristensen>
if we do that, maybe should extend the status.nixos.org page to show those in addition to issues labeled channel blocker
danderson has joined #nixos-infra
jonringer has joined #nixos-infra
<cole-h>
We do have a general purpose "infrastructure" label that could be repurposed?