<flokli> arianvp: Mic92: any chance one of you could give https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/93024 a quick look?
<{^_^}> #93024 (by flokli, 1 day ago, open): lvm: cleanups
<arianvp> Yes
<flokli> It's a prerequisite for all the cryptsetup stuff, because we run into bootstrapping problems otherwise
<flokli> systemd released a 246-rc1 some days ago, ideally we could enable cryptsetup support with the 246 release
<flokli> (while still not making any use of it for all stage1/2 stuff, that's still much more work)
<Mic92> left some notes.
<flokli> Mic92: why is command -v preferred over `which`?
<Mic92> flokli: better, consistent posix semantics across different plattforms. Not that it matters a lot since we only ever will use it with busybox.
<Mic92> In bash its also a builtin and therefor faster than which
<Mic92> *therefore
ckauhaus has joined #nixos-systemd
<flokli> Mic92: updated the PR, can you do another round?
elvishjerricco has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
elvishjerricco has joined #nixos-systemd
globin has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
globin has joined #nixos-systemd
<flokli> TIL: mobile nixos uses its own init system in stage1, written in ruby: https://github.com/NixOS/mobile-nixos/pull/66/files
<Mic92> It was mentioned in some mobile nixos update. It's actually mruby
<Mic92> Makes code sharing with NixOS harder though
ckauhaus has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.7.1]
qyliss has quit [Quit: bye]
qyliss has joined #nixos-systemd
<flokli> yeah, I'm still hoping to eventually converge to a systemd in-initrd covering most of the stuff we want to do in NixOS and Mobile NixOS.
<Mic92> I think archlinux got this far.
<Mic92> You can borrow ideas from their.
<Mic92> *there
<flokli> yeah, I mean, our problem(s) are more about modelling our existing feature set in in-initrd units I think