<shlevy>
gchristensen: IMO for the installer itself just getting a +1 from someone on the team should be good. Until the release process is solidified, though, I'd ping him for backports
<shlevy>
(I haven't reviewed that one myself because I'm too close to its implementation and use case ;) )
<shlevy>
gchristensen: Hmm... I think this definitely belongs in build-remote.cc instead. Setting aside separation of concerns, in this PR you lose the "but I am a <foo>" message... It's no longer clear if the build failed because you have no remotes at all, or because you lack the right system, or because you lack the right features. That information is all available in build-remote's context.
<gchristensen>
interesting
<gchristensen>
can you point me to where it would make sense in there?